Thursday, 29 September 2016

surgical strike against terrorism, not Pakistan

Finally India avenged the Uri attack. Hats off to Indian Army. They have given a just reply to terrorism. But why are we celebrating this as a victory against Pakistan? Was it an attack on Pakistan or on terrorists based in Pakistan? Can't we see the things differently? When Pakistan PM cries in the UNGA that Pakistan itself has turned to be a terror-torn country, is it not the duty of all its neighbours to go and help Pakistan to fight out terrorism? India has performed that honest duty only by this surgical attack. India is not against the people of Pakistan who too have been living a life of uncertainty just because of the terrorist outfits in Pakistan. What else can India do with those terrorist outfits behind Pathankot and Uri attack, who are based in Pakistan and allegedly funded by Pakistan govt. and Pakistani Army and of course the ISI? If the tears that Mr Nawaz Sharif sheded in UNGA were true then he will surely make a call to Mr Modi to thank for his honest initiative against terrorism. I think the people of Pakistan will also take it that way. As their Govt., their Army all have 'failed'(?) to dominate the terrorist outfits breeding and flourishing in Pakistan, they should surely convey their thanks to India. Here I would like to urge the people of Pakistan to come out and ask their govt. to join hands with India to fight against terrorism. Its time they realised that the Hafeez Sayeed who takes out rallies in the streets of Pakistan against India, sends suicide bombers to blast in Masjids of Pakistan itself killing his 'own' people. Terrorists can't be anyone's own. They are the enemy of humanity only. So the war should be against terrorism, not against India or Pakistan, not between India and Pakistan. Or there will be no survivors to celebrate the victory, either in India or in Pakistan.